W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

considering new issues: rdfSemantics, owlIntegration, owlDisjunction

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 08:18:23 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1126185503.4430.78.camel@dirk>

Given recent discussion and comments, I'm inclined to add
three issues to our issues list...
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues

rdfSemantics -- should queries of equivalent graphs
give the same answers? Any practical advice about queries
over infinite graph such as all the RDF axiomatic triples?

owlIntegration -- some explicit explanation of how OWL integrates
with SPARQL seems worthwhile.

owlDisjunction -- the worker example evidently doesn't work
well with SPARQL as of the 21 July 2005 LCWD. Are there
mature designs that work better? At a minimum, we should
be explicit that we don't handle this.

Are those reasonably good issue names and descriptons?
The descriptions are easier to change than the names, btw.
Is that too many or too few issues to cover recent discussions?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 13:20:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT