W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: clearing up CONSTRUCT's capabilities

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:59:44 -0400
To: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050804145944.GL30749@monkeyfist.com>

On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 10:31:56AM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
> 
> Dogs,
> 
> I know I should be working on the protocol stuff (and I am), but I want to
> suggest some small, clarificatory changes to the language on CONSTRUCT.  The
> way the language reads right now
> 
>   The CONSTRUCT result form returns a single RDF graph specified by a graph
>   template. The result is an RDF graph formed by taking each query solution
>   in the solution sequence, substituting for the variables into the graph
>   template and combining the triples into a single RDF graph by set union.
> 
> This is admirably clear, and I have no problem with it. However, it doesn't
> say anything about ground triples in the graph template and, thus, in the
> result graph created by CONSTRUCT. I've spoken with Andy about this, and we
> agree that the spec doesn't say anything to contract ground triples in the
> graph template.

Err. "contract" should have been "contradict". 

Kendall
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 15:01:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT