- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:59:44 -0400
- To: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 10:31:56AM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote: > > Dogs, > > I know I should be working on the protocol stuff (and I am), but I want to > suggest some small, clarificatory changes to the language on CONSTRUCT. The > way the language reads right now > > The CONSTRUCT result form returns a single RDF graph specified by a graph > template. The result is an RDF graph formed by taking each query solution > in the solution sequence, substituting for the variables into the graph > template and combining the triples into a single RDF graph by set union. > > This is admirably clear, and I have no problem with it. However, it doesn't > say anything about ground triples in the graph template and, thus, in the > result graph created by CONSTRUCT. I've spoken with Andy about this, and we > agree that the spec doesn't say anything to contract ground triples in the > graph template. Err. "contract" should have been "contradict". Kendall
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 15:01:52 UTC