W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: rq23 & protocol spec?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:31:10 -0500
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1122643870.31751.263.camel@localhost>

On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 10:54 -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
> Andy & Eric,
> I think that rq23 should at least refer to the ability to specify an RDF
> dataset in the SPARQL protocol (and, further, to at least point to the
> section in SPROT about resolving ambiguous datasets). I think that would
> make the protocol doc a normative reference.
> The coupling between these two should be very loose, but I think it's too
> lose currently. At the very minimum it should say something like "See
> [SPROT] for more information about RDF datasets" *somewhere* in the query
> language spec.

Yes, I think an informative "For other ways of specifying datasets,
see the protocol spec" is the way to go.

> If it already says this, please forgive me, and a pointer to where would be
> nice. I couldn't find anything.
> Cheers,
> Kendall Clark
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 29 July 2005 13:31:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:48 UTC