W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Editorial comments :: 2005Jul/{0028,0029,0041}

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:57:17 +0100
Message-ID: <42E4EFBD.9030903@hp.com>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

I consider the following editorial:

==== SPARQL: use of "my", etc in examples
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0028


(All uses of "my" actually in examples which shoud not be translated anyway)

Proposals:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#syntaxMisc
2.8: replace with ":myClass" with ":appClass"

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#rdfliterals
3: "abc"^^myNS:myDataType => "abc"^^appNS:myDataType


http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#construct
10.3
http://example.org/myGraph => http://example.org/aGraph
app:myDate => app:customDate

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#describe
10.4
myOrg.example => org.example.com
myOrg: => exOrg:

11.2.4 Extensible Value Testing
my: => func:
http://my.example => http://example.org/
myGeo: => aGeo:


==== SPARQL: XML 1.1 EBNF normative
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/0029

add link at EBNF to XML 1.1 (which is already in normative section because Dan 
has already done it) in grammar section


==== SPARQL: incorrect/confusing example in 9.3
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0041

Proposal:
Fix example to use mailto:aloce@work.example.org>


	Andy
Received on Monday, 25 July 2005 13:57:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT