- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:57:17 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I consider the following editorial: ==== SPARQL: use of "my", etc in examples http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0028 (All uses of "my" actually in examples which shoud not be translated anyway) Proposals: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#syntaxMisc 2.8: replace with ":myClass" with ":appClass" http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#rdfliterals 3: "abc"^^myNS:myDataType => "abc"^^appNS:myDataType http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#construct 10.3 http://example.org/myGraph => http://example.org/aGraph app:myDate => app:customDate http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#describe 10.4 myOrg.example => org.example.com myOrg: => exOrg: 11.2.4 Extensible Value Testing my: => func: http://my.example => http://example.org/ myGeo: => aGeo: ==== SPARQL: XML 1.1 EBNF normative http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/0029 add link at EBNF to XML 1.1 (which is already in normative section because Dan has already done it) in grammar section ==== SPARQL: incorrect/confusing example in 9.3 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0041 Proposal: Fix example to use mailto:aloce@work.example.org> Andy
Received on Monday, 25 July 2005 13:57:28 UTC