hypertext version... http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html $Revision: 1.8 $ of $Date: 2005/03/29 16:33:33 $ text version is attached -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E [1]W3C [2]RDF Data Access WG [1] http://www.w3.org/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ RDF Data Access Weekly Teleconference 29 Mar 2005 See also: [3]agenda, [4]IRC log [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0510.html [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-irc Attendees Present Kevin, Yoshio, DanC, BryanT, AndyS, EricP, Kendall_Clark, PatH, JanneS Regrets DaveB, SteveH, JosD Chair DanC Scribe EricP Contents * [5]Topics 1. [6]Convene, take roll, review records and agenda 2. [7]Use Cases and Requirements publication 3. [8]issue: sort 4. [9]issue: valueTesting 5. [10]SPARQL QL LC Candidate 6. [11]privacy section for protocol spec 7. [12]issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol, fromUnionQuery 8. [13]issue: xmlAbstractSyntax * [14]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________________ Convene, take roll, review records and agenda <DanC> Scribe: EricP RESOLVED to ammend [15]MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review with [16]action tracking notes and accept it as a true record [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0472.html [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0520.html <DanC> ACTION: DaveB to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer [recorded in [17]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action01] <scribe> ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [recorded in [18]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action02] <scribe> ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page [recorded in [19]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action03] <scribe> ACTION: SteveH to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs [recorded in [20]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action04] <scribe> ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve [recorded in [21]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action05] <scribe> ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) [recorded in [22]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action06] <scribe> ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no deadline/urgency) [recorded in [23]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action07] ALL CONTINUED without discussion <DanC> next meeting: 5 Apr... <DanC> then let's do meet 5 Apr, KC to scribe. <AndyS> Regrets for next week (April 5) regrets 2 week hence: EricP, DaveB, SteveH plus, AndyS, if i recall his vacation schedule <Yoshio> I think there is considarable concern on XML serialization of the resutl (<mail> vs. <var name="mail"> issue) We didn't discuss that due to DaveB's absence and lack of time. Use Cases and Requirements publication <scribe> DONE: KC, AFS, EP to publish usecases 1.148 + revision to 2.18 by KC, reviewed by AFS, plus editorial fixups by KC, ok'd by EricP <scribe> DONE: [24]http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20050325/ and [25]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases is back to editor's draft status 1.158 [24] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20050325/ [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases <DanC> "We invite feedback on which features are required for a first version of SPARQL and which should be postponed in order to expedite deployment of others." -- [26]http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20050325/ [26] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20050325/ <scribe> DONE: Kendall to To rewrite 2.18: change the title, don't motivate "update", spell "WSDL" correctly. :> <scribe> DONE: [27]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases 1.149 [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases issue: sort <scribe> ACTION: PatH to review sort design in 2 weeks [recorded in [28]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action10] <DanC> 1.278 [29]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ [29] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ andy believes he has reached a quiescient (SP?) state <scribe> DONE: Kevin to review sort design at earliest convenience [recorded in [30]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action11] [31]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/048 3.html [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0483.html <Yoshio> quiescent <AndyS> Google :: define:quiescent => "refers to a state of resting, inactivity or latency" <AndyS> Also "A volcano, which is not active, but is still registering seismic activity." :-) <thompsonbry> How could we extend from lexical comparison to achieve value comparison in a subsequent design? Kevin: I pointed out a few issues (consistency with distinct and a few others) ... Thought the interest was in ORDER BY and LIMIT, which is doable with LEXICAL sort Andy, lexical ordering doesn't neccesarily give you total ordering Kevin: we could have a future syntax for value ordering <Yoshio> I think the problem is that data could be gathered from various sources, where the data type are different Andy: my pref is to go with value ordering (what people expect) ... we can do lexical sort with str(?foo) <thompsonbry> Andy, how does typing interact with functions to specify how a value sort will be applied? DanC: we can also postpoine... no takers. <AndyS> See doc : can write "ORDER BY x:func(?x)" as a (partial) ordering issue: valueTesting <scribe> ACTION: EricP to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others) [recorded in [32]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action12] <scribe> CONTINUED. expect to meet end of month deadline action -10 <Zakim> AndyS, you wanted to ask about != <DanC> (I suspect "error" is misleading terminology... "unkown" might communicate the notion better) EricP: how do people feel about requiring explicity casts where XQuery would not require them? [ no probs with it ] #invocation #StandardOperations <Zakim> Yoshio, you wanted to ask if this applies to cases where there is no data for deciding the equality Yoshio: how about unknown equiv in sorting? PatH: how about we don't define it so folks don't rely on it. <Yoshio> me: even if they are of the same data type tx <Zakim> DanC, you wanted to ask if the "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe test is in the test suite, and ask for a volunteer if not and to reiterate suggestion about compliance and unknown AndyS: in SQL world, people do rely on the ordering and causes trouble <DanC> ACTION: AndyS to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe [recorded in [33]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action13] SPARQL QL LC Candidate <scribe> ACTION: AndyS to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption [CONTINUED] [recorded in [34]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action14] <scribe> ... pending discussion with Bob and Jess Geoff tx <Yoshio> I'm for construct * <scribe> DONE: AndyS to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH. [recorded in [35]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action15] <kendall> long conversation sorta put me off attending to it carefully, sorry :> <AndyS> It's not CONSTRUCT * but there is "Accessing Graphs in the RDF Dataset" <DanC> "Accessing Graphs in the RDF Dataset" -- [36]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#construct [36] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#construct <scribe> DONE , above pointer action -14 <kendall> (hmm, another reason for a getGraph in the protocol is for implementations taht don't support construct at all.) <scribe> ACTION: DaveB to consider dots in qnames, report on impact on turtle [recorded in [37]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action16] AndyS: won't get rid of all the todos by thur. ... which way do you want it? <kendall> it's by-invitation only, so Eric's trying to be respectful of that. :> <kendall> it was scheduled a long time ago, btw <thompsonbry> Dan, since Andy will be pulling hair for the 31st, why don't we just back the candidate for review by another week - especially since we have one meeting canceled. <DanC> ACTION: DanC to review editors draft (delivered 31 Mar) by 5 Apr [recorded in [38]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action17] <DanC> Kendall expects Bijan to review it <DanC> ACTION: EricP to notify the WG of editors draft (or change of plans) by 31 Mar [recorded in [39]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action18] DanC: Andy, anything test that does not have a clear outcome is critical path privacy section for protocol spec <scribe> ACTION: EricP to propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol [DONE] [recorded in [40]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action20] <DanC> ACTION: KendallC to incorporate EricP's privacy text, salting to taste [recorded in [41]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action19] issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol, fromUnionQuery <DanC> [42]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol <kendall> "wsdl interfaces" better than "abstract protocol", but -shrug- KendallC: happy with the WSDL except some bits of WSDL 2.0 that I don't know how to spell ... have carefully tried to document a non-researchy interface <kendall> don't know how to spell *yet* :> <DanC> "(SPARQLQuery and SPARQLDiscovery and SPARQLQueryAndDiscovery)" <DanC> SPARQLQuery SPARQLSaddle SPARQLQS <kendall> SPARQLQuery -> SparqlQuery; SPARQLDiscovery -> SparqlSaddle; SPARQLQueryAndDiscovery -> SparqlQS KendallC: total of 8 interfaces <DanC> OPTIONS: all 5 primary (total 8), 3 SPARQLQuery SPARQLSaddle SPARQLQS, other (none, something else) KendallC: 5 primative interfaces and 3 unions of them <kendall> 5 primary, 4 "derived interfaces <DanC> OPTIONS: all 5 primary (total 9), 3 SPARQLQuery SPARQLSaddle SPARQLQS, other (none, something else) <DanC> Zakim who's on the phone? <thompsonbry> Do we have a mapping of these interfaces onto the use cases? AndyS: interested in 3. don't know how datasets work in this proposal <kendall> ooh, yoshio makes a good point. thanks. have a mispelling. Kevin: nothign to say, not at boston Yoshio: nothing to say DanC: in favor of 3 BryanT: want to interface to create and drop graphs EricP: 3 KendallC: pass PatH: pass Janne: originally wanted lots of primitives. now want minimal set. 3. KendallC: (unpassing) i remember 3 getting the most support in BOS. Graph retrieval has support to go to its own interface. DanC: JaceK pointed out an existing interface and the room got quiet. tx KendallC: not making a pitch for the derived interfaces. just thought they were a nice organisational tool. <thompsonbry> Own what issue? <scribe> ACTION: KendallC to own WSDL interfaces. [recorded in [43]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action21] action -20 <JanneS> (I have to run for tonight - cheers) <scribe> ACTION: KendallC to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft, propose to WG. [recorded in [44]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action22] <DanC> make sure it includes wsdlAbstractProtocol action -21 issue: xmlAbstractSyntax <scribe> ACTION: KendallC to tie WSDL description (wsdlAbstractProtocol) of protocol to editor's draft, propose to WG. [recorded in [45]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action23] <DanC> [46]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#xmlAbstractSyntax [46] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#xmlAbstractSyntax <DanC> [47]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/sparqlx.xsd [47] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/sparqlx.xsd <DanC> [48]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/sparqlx.rnc [48] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/sparqlx.rnc <DanC> [49]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/sparqlx.rng [49] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/sparqlx.rng scribe is losing connectivity notes at risk <DanC> # SPARQL Abstract Syntax Seaborne, Andy (Monday, 21 March) [50]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/039 3.html [50] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0393.html <DanC> sparqlx.rnc 1.6 makes sense to me, i think KendallC: wasn't going to invest much work if it was not likely to gain support PatH: what are the design goals of the XML serialization? DanC: making two contrete syntaxes makes the abstract syntax clear ... in web services, the input in defined by XS datatypes. <AndyS> <> rdfs:seeAlso [51]http://www.w3.org/TR/xqueryx/ [51] http://www.w3.org/TR/xqueryx/ [plus, i keep getting hints that my connectivity is at risk] <AndyS> FWIW I didn't make the abstract syntax obvious because there was only one concrete syntax BryanT: how coupled is the human syntax to the X-syntax <kendall> oh, also, another design goal is to not worry overly about being able to roundtrip from surface syntax to xml and back -- hence, no PREFIX in the XML. Andy: change from RDQL to N3 syntax did not impact the abstract syntax [missing all voice now] can i get a substitute scribe? <DanC> ACTION: KendallC to work out remaining details in sparqlx.{rnc,xsd,rng}: expression syntax, order-by stuff [recorded in [52]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action24] ADJOUNRED Summary of Action Items [CONTINUED] ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) [recorded in [53]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action06] [NEW] ACTION: AndyS to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe [recorded in [54]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action13] [CONTINUED] ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [recorded in [55]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: DanC to review editors draft (delivered 31 Mar) by 5 Mar [recorded in [56]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action17] [CONTINUED] ACTION: DaveB to consider dots in qnames, report on impact on turtle [recorded in [57]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action16] [CONTINUED] ACTION: DaveB to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer [recorded in [58]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action01] [CONTINUED] ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve [recorded in [59]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action05] [NEW] ACTION: EricP to notify the WG of editors draft (or change of plans) by 31 Mar [recorded in [60]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action18] [CONTINUED] ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page [recorded in [61]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action03] [CONTINUED] ACTION: EricP to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others) [recorded in [62]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action12] [CONTINUED] ACTION: KendallC to own wsdlAbstractProtocol (based on WSDL description added to protocol to editor's draft). [recorded in [63]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action22] [NEW] ACTION: KendallC to incorporate EricP's privacy text, salting to taste [recorded in [64]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action19] [NEW] ACTION: KendallC to work out remaining details in sparqlx.{rnc,xsd,rng}: expression syntax, order-by stuff [recorded in [65]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action24] [CONTINUED] ACTION: PatH to review sort design in 2 weeks [recorded in [66]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action10] [CONTINUED] ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no deadline/urgency) [recorded in [67]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action07] [CONTINUED] ACTION: SteveH to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs [recorded in [68]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action04] [PENDING] ACTION: AndyS to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption [recorded in [69]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html#action14] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________________ EricP, scribe DanC, chair $Revision: 1.8 $ of $Date: 2005/03/29 16:33:33 $ minutes formatted by David Booth's [70]scribe.perl [70] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htmReceived on Tuesday, 29 March 2005 16:40:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:01 GMT