W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:35:20 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1112027720.32006.281.camel@localhost>

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda

  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
  2005-03-29T14:30Z **local timezone info below

  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-irc

scribe: ??
regrets: DaveB, SteveH

 record for review:
MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0472.html
ammendment: show these two done:
 ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement
 ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal
and this one open:
 ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft,
propose to WG.


continue the following without discussion:
ACTION DanC: follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
ACTION EricP: to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page 
ACTION SteveH: to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named 
graphs
ACTION DaveB: to to propose source test to approve
ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to 
valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery)
ACTION SteveH: prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no 
deadline/urgency)

next meeting: 5 Apr. scribe volunteer?

comments on agenda?
 Due to the Easter holiday tomorrow and Monday, I'm drafting
 this tentative agenda early. I intend to either confirm or revise
 it 24hrs before the telcon.



2. Use Cases and Requirements publication

ACTION Kendall: To rewrite 2.18: change the title, don't motivate 
"update", spell "WSDL" correctly. :>
done: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases 1.149

ACTION KC, AFS, EP: publish usecases 1.148 + revision to 2.18 by KC, 
reviewed by AFS, plus editorial fixups by KC, ok'd by EricP
done:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20050325/

and http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases is
back to editor's draft status 1.158


3. issue: sort

ACTION Kevin: review sort design at earliest convenience
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0483.html

 perhaps that's a proposal about how to close the issue?

ACTION PatH: review sort design in 2 weeks



4. issue: valueTesting

ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test
cases, to EricP or others)


5. SPARQL QL LC Candidate

ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption
 (done, I think)

ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and
GRAPH.
 (done?)

ACTION DaveB: consider dots in qnames, report on impact on turtle
 (I see some progress in public-rdf-dawg-comments)

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
 $Revision: 1.270 $ of $Date: 2005/03/24 15:33:19 $

<AndyS> Quick status report on rq23:
<AndyS> The current draft is, for my sections, adequate for WG review
about issues.
<AndyS> It is not finished - there are several ToDo items left
<AndyS> The discussions on the comments list have been very useful but
added a delay (work
<AndyS> that woudl have to be done anyway)
<AndyS> Not sure what the quality threshold shoudl be for a WG LC
candidate.


6. privacy section for protocol spec

ACTION EricP: propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0416.html

not much response... everybody agrees?


7. issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol, fromUnionQuery

 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol

ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft,
propose to WG.

progress:
sparql-protocol.wsdl updated Kendall Clark (Monday, 21 March)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0382.html

perhaps it addresses fromUnionQuery?
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#fromUnionQuery


8. issue: xmlAbstractSyntax
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#xmlAbstractSyntax

Note new issue, progress, discuss expectations, recruit owner?


9. issue: serviceDescription
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#serviceDescription

Note formalized (not really new) issue. Discuss expectations.



** local timezone info

      [      tlt:localTime  (
            "Brussels"
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "Chicago"
            "Tue 8:30 AM"  ),
                     (
            "London"
            "Tue 3:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "New York"
            "Tue 9:30 AM"  ),
                     (
            "Rome"
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "Tokyo"
            "Tue 11:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "Vancouver"
            "Tue 6:30 AM"  );
             tlt:startTimePage
<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=29&month=03&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0>;
             cal:dtstart  [
                 cal:dateTime "2005-03-29T14:30Z" ] ].



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 28 March 2005 16:35:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:22 GMT