W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:32:57 -0500
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050323153257.GA9558@monkeyfist.com>

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:28:57AM -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:

> ah... good... in compact syntax... something I can grok at a glance.
> (if there are good schema visualization tools, I don't have any
> experience with them).
> When I saw Andy's abstract syntax message, I thought "I wonder
> what that looks like in RNG syntax".
> Now I can compare and contrast...

Well it has "bugs", which in this context means things that aren't
"correctly" induced from the examples, because the examples don't
provide perfect coverage of the grammar.

But, yes, I grok this much better than WXS.

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 15:38:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:46 UTC