Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:28:57AM -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:

> ah... good... in compact syntax... something I can grok at a glance.
> (if there are good schema visualization tools, I don't have any
> experience with them).
> 
> When I saw Andy's abstract syntax message, I thought "I wonder
> what that looks like in RNG syntax".
> 
> Now I can compare and contrast...

Well it has "bugs", which in this context means things that aren't
"correctly" induced from the examples, because the examples don't
provide perfect coverage of the grammar.

But, yes, I grok this much better than WXS.

Kendall