On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 09:55 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:46:05PM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > I thought it might be something like that - you'd said your were doing > > examples so I followed the examples. > > Even worse, I simply included the wrong schema in my zip file. Doh! > > Here's the "correct" one -- that is, the one that actually schematizes > the examples. ah... good... in compact syntax... something I can grok at a glance. (if there are good schema visualization tools, I don't have any experience with them). When I saw Andy's abstract syntax message, I thought "I wonder what that looks like in RNG syntax". Now I can compare and contrast... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 15:28:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:01 GMT