W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: sparqlx

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:40:34 -0500
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050323144034.GA2972@monkeyfist.com>

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:46:48AM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote:

> Well - I'm assuming the examples are better guidance than the schema.  I 
> found things in the schema which I didn't expect (prefixes - I think of 
> them as merely part of shorthand for URIs - if you wish to round trip both 
> syntaxes in a human readable way, then they migh tbe needed but for query 
> meaning, they aren't) and things that weren't in examples (tpattern, 
> gpattern).

Ah, I see the problem. I'm inducing the schema from the examples using
trang, and I think some old, abandoned XML instances got included in
the set I used for induction.

I will regenerate the schema and repost it; that tpattern, gpattern,
prefix stuff is historical cruft that's abandoned. Sorry 'bout that.

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 14:45:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:46 UTC