W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 13:47:21 -0500
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050307184721.GC13793@monkeyfist.com>

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:55:45AM -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> If the action was to show the feasibility, then it is completed.

I think I understand what you've done. But my only concerns are

  1. Jos's case of being able to say that a graph is closed over an
     arbitrary (?) set of rules

  2. the point that Bijan raises in a later message; that, for
     example, a graph may be closed over only the "interesting" subset
     of, say, RDFS entailments... Maybe there's not a real need to be
     able to say something this specific in the service description,
     but I can imagine a client taking "RDFS closure" in a strong way,
     querying for some triple that's inferred by one of the RDFS
     entailment rules that a particular graph *doesn't* implement...

Both of these seem corner cases, though I recognize that may just mean
"not my use case".

Jos?

Kendall
Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 18:51:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:22 GMT