W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: presentation about DAWG

From: Hiroyuki Sato <sato.hiroyuki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:15:55 +0900
Message-ID: <4212041B.4040902@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

As I told in my previous mail, I gave presentation about DAWG
at INTAP Semantic Web conference 2005 last week.
Thanks to Eric and Yoshio for giving comments on my presentation material.

About 230 people, including Eric and Yoshio, participated in this event
and it successfully ended.

I got the following comments from audiences and people
who concerned conference.

1. What are the differences from RDQL?
Some people say that they want to use SPARQL
if it has obviously new feature.

2. Document about protocol (SPARQL Protocol for RDF) should
provide concrete SOAP protocol as well as HTTP.

3. There is a lot of expectation for the spec for handling multiple graphs
   People wonder if they can handle multiple graphs by only using API
for query processor, but they seem to feel that it is important.

Hiroyuki Sato  <sato.hiroyuki@lab.ntt.co.jp>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 01:14 +0900, Hiroyuki Sato wrote:
>>I am asked to have a presentation about DAWG at INTAP Semantic Web conference
> Excellent.
>>The conference will be held in Tokyo, Japan on February 10.
>>More than 10 Japanese organizations using the Semantic Web will also have
>>presentations and demonstrations.
>>This is a local event (not international conference), but at the last conference
>>Daniel Weitzner and Eric Miller gave their presentations through an interpreter
>>and about 200 people participated.
>>I have 25 minutes, so I would like to introduce overview and objective of DAWG,
>>how an RDF query language could be used, interesting specifications of SPARQL,
>>and so on.
>>Dan, if you have any suggestion for my presentation, please give me at F2F4.
> OK.
>>I will also ask Yoshio to check presentation material in advance because it will
>>be prepared in Japanese.
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 14:15:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:46 UTC