W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 31 May

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:52:09 +0100
Message-ID: <429C41D9.7070003@hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>



Dan Connolly wrote:
<snip/>
> 8. Last Call schedule
> 
> old plan:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0219.html
> 
> May 31 for a WG candidate for last call for SPARQL/Q
> 
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ v 1.363 of 2005/05/30
> 
> (taking a scan, I don't think we're finished with
> my comments on
>  - URI/IRI (I still see "the subject, which is an RDF URI reference")
>  - definitions, esp constraint (more on that separately)
>  - references
> perhaps those can be addressed in parallel with other reviews
> )
> 
> 2 weeks later for a WG candidate for SPARQL/P
> 
> We will be looking for at least two reviewers for each docuemnt.

What will be the process for WG review?  It might be useful to be more formal 
about issue tracking - we have to have a process for LC anyway.  One email 
message - many issues may not be the best way forward.

For LC, some groups are using Bugzilla.  Has that gone well?

<snip/>

	Andy
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2005 10:52:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT