W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

agenda: RDF Data Access 31 May

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 10:04:00 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1117465440.19175.31.camel@localhost>

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda

  2005-05-31T14:30Z **local times below

  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/05/31-dawg-irc

Scribe: Eric Prud'hommeaux

Minutes : RDF Data Access telecon : 24 May 2005

next meeting: 7 Jun. Scribe volunteer?

note the following done without discussion: @@
continue the following without discussion:
ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no 
ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test 
cases) (don't expect quick delivery)

comments on agenda?
 it's a U.S. holiday today, so I'm not likely
 to read replies to this message or other WG email
 until tomorrow. Hmm... lots of actions on me, meanwhile.

2. publishing results format, protocol

ACTION EricP: to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ 1.25
+ editorial notes from DaveB + check from Kendall


and there was much rejoicing.

Announce these more widely?

3. issue fromUnionQuery

Are we there yet? Ready to close this one?

ACTION: EricP to try out the "2 list of URIs" datasets design from 

4. issue: valueTesting

ACTION: DanC to send comment on non-use of 
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes to schema comments list

ACTION: EricP to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe

ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal
Eric asked for assistance from SteveH.

5. some comments

ACTION DanC: noodle on uri() and str() issue from email 

There had been a post-telecon discussion after the May 17 telecon between DanC 
and PatH about this subject and the action continues.

ACTION: DanC to rethink the use/mention issue w.r.t Tim's email 

this one is still pending too:
SPARQL requirements (and INSERT)

6. issue wsdlAbstractProtocol

ACTION DanC: try splitting SparqlQuery interface into SparqlGraph SparqlBindings

7. punctuationSyntax

Are we done?

"I have updated the grammar in rq23 in preparation for the LC candidate. ..."
  -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0262.html

8. Last Call schedule

old plan:

May 31 for a WG candidate for last call for SPARQL/Q

 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ v 1.363 of 2005/05/30

(taking a scan, I don't think we're finished with
my comments on
 - URI/IRI (I still see "the subject, which is an RDF URI reference")
 - definitions, esp constraint (more on that separately)
 - references
perhaps those can be addressed in parallel with other reviews

2 weeks later for a WG candidate for SPARQL/P

We will be looking for at least two reviewers for each docuemnt.

** local times
      [      tlt:localTime  (
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 9:30 AM"  ),
            "Tue 5:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 3:30 PM"  ),
            "New York"
            "Tue 10:30 AM"  ),
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 11:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 7:30 AM"  );
             cal:dtstart  [
                 cal:dateTime "2005-05-31T14:30Z" ] ].

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 30 May 2005 15:04:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:47 UTC