W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

agenda: RDF Data Access 24 May

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 09:52:09 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1116859929.3429.508.camel@localhost>

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda


  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/05/24-dawg-irc

scribe: AndyS (with help when he discusses)

Minutes of the 2005-05-17 RDF DAWG teleconference for review

next meeting: 31 May. scribe volunteer?

note the following done without discussion:
ACTION AndyS: get tests/data/sort/query-sort-1.rq marked approved

continue the following without discussion:
ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no
ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to
valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery)

comments on agenda?
Note I'm flying to AMS today.

2. publishing results format, protocol

ACTION EricP: to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ 1.25
+ editorial notes from DaveB + check from Kendall
CONTINUED (DanC might do this for Eric)

3. issue fromUnionQuery

ACTION KendallC: reword "the protocol must be preferred by a SPARQL 
query service", perhaps w.r.t. the WSDL interface

ACTION: EricP to try out the "2 list of URIs" datasets design from

4. issue: valueTesting

ACTION: DanC to send comment on non-use of
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes> to schema comments list

ACTION: EricP to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe

ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal

5. some comments

ACTION DanC: noodle on uri() and str() issue from email

ACTION: DanC to rethink the use/mention issue w.r.t Tim's email

6. issue wsdlAbstractProtocol

ACTION DanC: try splitting SparqlQuery interface into SparqlGraph 

(not looking likely; sorry)

ACTION: KendallC to ask WSD WG for clarification about HTTP binding of
WSDL2, esp lists of URIs

7. punctuationSyntax

Hmm... how to close? Grammar in the QL editor's draft OK?

8. Last Call schedule

editors care to guesstimate LC candidate delivery?
line up reviewers?

      [      tlt:localTime  (
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 9:30 AM"  ),
            "Tue 5:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 3:30 PM"  ),
            "New York"
            "Tue 10:30 AM"  ),
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 11:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 7:30 AM"  );
             cal:dtstart  [
                 cal:dateTime "2005-05-24T14:30Z" ] ].

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
see you at XTech in Amsterdam 24-27 May?
Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 14:52:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:47 UTC