W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: output-xslt good enough for sort objective?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:53:11 -0500
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1113742391.4891.553.camel@localhost>

On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 14:26 -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:36:33AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> > That looks like critical mass. Kendall, please think about
> > including that as you're drafting the protocol.
> 
> I think this is a good addition, and it should be relatively simple --
> just a matter of changing the query type to include this URI, and then
> making a spot for it in the bindings.
> 
> > Hmm... it would be nice to have output-xslt-params too,
> > so that the same bit of XSLT could be re-used with different
> > variable names and such.
> 
> That's an opaque string or some kind of struct or what?

I was thinking a set of name/value pairs.

>  (The Amazon
> XSLT web service might be a place to look for what's relevant and
> useful hereabouts...)
> 
> Kendall Clark
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Sunday, 17 April 2005 12:53:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT