W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:21:49 +0100
Message-ID: <425BAF4D.2010601@hp.com>
To: Jeen Broekstra <jeen@aduna.biz>
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
>>On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 12:46 +0200, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
>>>On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:07 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
>>>>A comment asks...
>>>>"How many of the 14 test questions in [1] does the current SPARQL spec
>>>>cover ?"
>>>>-> http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/pha/rdf-query/
>>>>I'm interested to take a crack at it, but I'd like some confirmation
>>>>from other WG members that I've got this right before I reply.
>>>>Perhaps it's worth making these into test cases...
>>>I am one of the co-authors of that report, so if I can help out in any 
>>>way let me know.
>>I think it would be great for you to add these cases to our test
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/
>>If you're interested, send an ssh2 public key to EricP and me
>>and we'll try to arrange CVS write access. I presume you can
>>get in touch with Steve to learn anything you don't yet know
>>about how our test suite works.
> Alright, I'll give it a go.
> [comments on closed-world assumption, quantification and counting objects]
> I'm taking this as input for the test cases on that report as well. We 
> need to formulate some of these cases a bit sharper, apparently.
> Jeen

Jeen checked in the tests and they have been run successfully by ARQ.

   Tests 1-3,8-13

Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 11:22:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:47 UTC