W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:54:32 -0500
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Cc: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1096491272.5269.25.camel@dirk>
Umm... when you forward these, ideally, I'd like to
see a proposed reply... or at least some thoughts
of your own on the matter. The raw bits are already
available to the WG, just a few clicks from the WG
homepage.

Are you persuaded to remove FROM by his comments?

Based on my implementation experience, I think I wouldn't
miss it, but I haven't thought it thru carefully.

On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:46, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: FROM keyword unnecessary?
> Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:06:22 +0000
> Resent-From: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:42:46 +0000
> From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>
> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> 
> 
> Hi Andy, Hi Dawg comments
> 
> I'm struggling to see the value of having the 'FROM' functionality in
> the query language, even in the local case.
[...]

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 20:54:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT