I attach two possible result formats that vary in one design choice - 1) variable names are element names and hence the XML is schemaless 2) variable names are content and the XML has a tight schema. I presently prefer the former result1.xml since it seems more natural XML to use the application terms - the variable names - as element names. The result XPath, XSLT etc. would read better I think. result2.xml comes with a RelaxNG compact, RelaxNG and W3C XML Schemas that all validate the document. It's got inline schemaLocation as an example, but that is optional if I understand WXS correctly. Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:31 GMT