W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: RDF QL name survey

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:43:06 +0100
Message-ID: <8D5B24B83C6A2E4B9E7EE5FA82627DC93966F0@sdcexcea01.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

It might be useful to have what the acronyms stand for.  

The instructions say: "You have 10 points. Allocate them to your
preferred names."

But some votes have taken this to be "vote 0-10 per candidate".  Is that
going to skew the results?

Also - I'd like to vote against having any name for the protocol.
"protocol" might imply some deep, large complex beast.

	Andy

-------- Original Message --------
> From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <>
> Date: 23 September 2004 13:48
> 
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:26:22AM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:18:25AM -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > > it doesn't separate the similar QLs from the distinct ones,
> > > but that isn't easy. suggestions welcome.
> > > 
> > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/DAWG-QL-name/2~
> 
> would you believe this is a hardware problem?
> the debounce (and everything else) is screwed up with my shift-ins
key.
> 
> > That URI is wrong, of course; this is the correct one:
> > 
> >   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/DAWG-QL-name/
> 
> tx for the correction
> 
> > But this is a bit flawed: there are at least two recent name ideas
> > missing: 
> > 
> > DART (for protocol)
> > SPARQL (for protocol and QL)
> > 
> > Please add them.
> 
> done
> --
> -eric
> 
> office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
>                         Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
>                         5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
>                         JAPAN
>         +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
> cell:   +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia)
> 
> (eric@w3.org)
> Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other
than
> email address distribution.
Received on Monday, 27 September 2004 14:43:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT