- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:25:49 +0100 (BST)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Dan Connolly wrote: > OK, I finished a first pass summarizing the IRC > logs as minutes: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf3-brs > $Revision: 1.31 $ of $Date: 2004/09/20 22:55:41 $ I looked at 1.36 and have the following comments Section SOURCE "@@chair/scribe sees discussion of technical details in the log but isn't sure how to summarize" [[We had discussion of technical details]] seems fine to me. Section issue: disjunction Please link to the tests I made that were projected: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0492.html (There is a slight bug in the data, and they have not been run by code) Section Query Language Syntax Please add the syntax example AndyS projected, I think it is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0511.html labelled as "The example query was:" The new syntax in the above message were not discussed in the f2f. Section Protocol: XML format for query results, HTTP Binding "ACTION DaveB: draft XML query results format spec. @@right, DaveB? the IRC log doesn't clearly show that you accpeted an action" Yes I accepted that action. -- Dave
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:25:53 UTC