W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

dcq:provenance

From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:24:03 +0200
Message-Id: <7DF983C4-0CEE-11D9-AAAB-0003939CA324@asemantics.com>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


it might be of interest to people here to support the SOURCE discussion  
- the DC Usage Board has recently announced a new term 'provenance'

more at  
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0409&L=dc- 
general&T=0&F=&S=&P=895

I am wondering now if this recent DC work might come to the rescue to  
help us to clarify why provenance information is needed, when, how -  
and what's best practice to express such information in RDF (the DC  
terms RDF Schema seems completely agnostic on it), as a statement (or  
group of statements), as resource, and if simply a URI or also a bNode.

anybody here knows more about this?

Alberto
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2004 23:24:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT