W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: names, elevator speeches, slides, and marketing

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:01:14 +0100
Message-ID: <8D5B24B83C6A2E4B9E7EE5FA82627DC920E22B@sdcexcea01.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Returning a graph is dark triples.


-------- Original Message --------
> From: Kendall Clark <>
> Date: 10 September 2004 14:45
> 
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 02:33:09PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
> > 
> > So I suggest:
> > 
> >   Data Access for RDF Query Language - DARQ (pronounced as "dark")
> >   Data Access for RDF Protocol       - DARP
> > 
> > of course, DARP*A* may like the latter :)
> 
> I'm not sure what's going on, but I keep finding myself in violent
> agreement with Dave Beckett. I guess that's gotta be a good thing!
> 
> Anyway, I'm not sure I agree that we need *two* names, but I actually
> like these two, especially DARQ/"dark". I think it's *great*. It's
> sorta basic and polyvalent at the same time, like SOAP.
> 
> So, how does it play in dialogue?
> 
> "How do I retrieve that RDF representation of the US Senate you were
> telling me about?", the man asks.
> 
> "Just use the Python client", the geek answers, "to connect to our
> server and send a dark query".
> 
> Nice, Dave.
> 
> Kendall Clark
> 
> PS--Maybe if we have a "DARP", then EricM will stop pimping Joseki at
> conferences and start pimping it! :>
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 14:02:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT