- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:01:14 +0100
- To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Returning a graph is dark triples. -------- Original Message -------- > From: Kendall Clark <> > Date: 10 September 2004 14:45 > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 02:33:09PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > > > > So I suggest: > > > > Data Access for RDF Query Language - DARQ (pronounced as "dark") > > Data Access for RDF Protocol - DARP > > > > of course, DARP*A* may like the latter :) > > I'm not sure what's going on, but I keep finding myself in violent > agreement with Dave Beckett. I guess that's gotta be a good thing! > > Anyway, I'm not sure I agree that we need *two* names, but I actually > like these two, especially DARQ/"dark". I think it's *great*. It's > sorta basic and polyvalent at the same time, like SOAP. > > So, how does it play in dialogue? > > "How do I retrieve that RDF representation of the US Senate you were > telling me about?", the man asks. > > "Just use the Python client", the geek answers, "to connect to our > server and send a dark query". > > Nice, Dave. > > Kendall Clark > > PS--Maybe if we have a "DARP", then EricM will stop pimping Joseki at > conferences and start pimping it! :>
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 14:02:52 UTC