W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 31 Aug

From: Tom Adams <tom@tucanatech.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:34:24 -0400
Message-Id: <5CF18CE6-FACC-11D8-BD3F-000A95C9112A@tucanatech.com>
To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

My regrets for tomorrow, don't think I can make it, yet another demo to  
be doing...

Will try to have my action fulfilled before hand.

Cheers,
Tom


On 30/08/2004, at 11:50 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> 1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda
>
>   RDF Data Access Working Group
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>   Tuesday 2004-08-31 14:30 UTC
>   Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
>   http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
>
> Scribe: AlbertoR
>   supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>        log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/08/31-dawg-irc
>
> roll call; cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
>  and/or http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
>
>
> PROPOSED: to accept meeting record 2004-08-24 as ammended
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ 
> 0371.html
>
> next meeting 2004-09-07. Scribe?
>
> Unless anyone has progress to report, let's
> continue these without discussion:
>
> ACTION: TomA: draft reply to Bjoerern Hoehrmann and send the
> drafts to the WG mailing list.
>
> ACTION: AndyS to show xmlopen slides to DAWG one or two days in  
> advance.
>
> ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in  
> the UC&R
> doc.
>
> ACTION SimonR: write about the "returning bnodes from a query" issue.
> CONTINUES.
>
> ACTION: RobS to write response to Simon's union query. UC4.5
>
> agenda ammendments?
>
>
> 2. ftf logistics
>
> Any logistics/hosting issues?
>  http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/F2F-Bristol.html
>
> FYI, here's my itinerary and such...
> http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/brs-itinb.txt
> http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/brs-itin.n3
> http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/
>
>
> 3. starting another BRQL spec walkthru
>
> I'd like more issue owner volunteers. Let's start walking thru
> the text of the spec.
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
>  $Revision: 1.42 $ of $Date: 2004/08/27 16:25:08 $
>
>
> 4. Use Cases & Requirements publication
>
> I gather this week is not the time, but let's double-check.
>
>
> 5. ftf agenda
>
> As I mentioned last week, I think the goal of the meeting is
> to get a Working Draft of the design released as a W3C Working Draft
> shortly after the ftf.
>
> Let's review our plans on these...
>
> ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting
> XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September
> meeting in Bristol.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2#xqfa
>
> ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services  
> use
> case.
>
> Anything else in particular?
>
>
>
> 6. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management
>
> ACTION: DaveB to repropose source in both results and restrictions.
>
> ACTION: AndyS to (try to) compose a test case on inferred triples
> DONE:  
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ 
> 0330.html
>
>
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>
>
>
>
-- 
Tom Adams                  | Tucana Technologies, Inc.
Support Engineer           |   Office: +1 703 871 5312
tom@tucanatech.com         |     Cell: +1 571 594 0847
http://www.tucanatech.com  |      Fax: +1 877 290 6687
------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 21:34:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT