W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: BRQL and typed literals

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:27:35 +0100
Message-ID: <E864E95CB35C1C46B72FEA0626A2E80803984CE0@0-mail-br1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org

Hi Patrick!

> I do wonder about the lack of any treatment for arbitrary
> typed literals. 

What would such treatment look like?  Something over-and-above adding
extension functions to the constraints?  A quick sketch (and test cases??
;-) would push the cause matter along.

	Andy


-------- Original Message --------
> From: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com <>
> Date: 27 July 2004 10:48
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Just wanted to send a brief note saying that I find BRQL to
> be quite promising, particularly its inclusion of the DESCRIBE
> clause.
> 
> I do wonder about the lack of any treatment for arbitrary
> typed literals. I'm presuming it is planned, but simply not
> added yet, eh?  ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Patrick
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Patrick Stickler
> Nokia, Finland
> patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2004 06:28:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT