W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:31:48 -0700
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Rob Shearer" <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
Cc: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOIEJJENAA.howardk@fatdog.com>

A few correction to the minutes of the f2f from my perspective:

(1) I'd like to be on the record as offering editorial feedback to Kendall,
with his previous concurrence, as a part of:

    <b>ACTION KendallC</b>: draft revision, toward updating our public
    WD, delivery ~next wed. <b>ACTION RobS</b>: review it.</p>

possibly in the same way as Rob: ie, "ACTION Howard to offer editorial
feedback" (speaking of which, Kendall, if you've been making progress that
should be imminent, no?)

(2) Re Simon's ACTION item:

    <b>ACTION SimonR</b>:
    write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting XQuery as an RDF
    query language for discussion thru the September meeting in Bristol.

I'd similarly like to be noted as "Howard to be a resource for Simon" or
some such, again with Simon's previous concurrence.

(3) I abstained on the BRQL/RDQL vote, where it was:

    <b>RESOLVED to adopt <a
    href="http://www.w3.org/2004/07/08-BRQL/">BRQL</a> v1.11 as our
    strawman query language design</b>, over the <b><a href=

"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0101.html"
    objection of RobS and JeffP of Network Inference</a></b>.</p>

(4) Re my participation in [1]: "RobS, EricP, HowardK, and SimonR explored
XQuery designs in another break-out":

I would love to be able to claim that I contributed substantively to this
effort but cannot in all honesty do so: one look at Simon's gobbledeegook on
the whiteboard was enough to induce uncontrollable shaking and cause all my
neural systems to go into complete shutdown. (Thank gawd no one's ever seen
that happen to me in public at least. :-)

Howard

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2#xqfa


> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 8:27 AM
> To: Rob Shearer
> Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group
> Subject: RE: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 20:24, Rob Shearer wrote:
> > Minutes look good overall.
> >
> > Minor question: was I given some action to communicate with someone
> > about the ebXML use case?
>
> Good question... the IRC notes say:
>
> ACTION: RobS write email to Farrukh
>  -- http://www.w3.org/2004/07/15-dawg-irc#T17-04-52
>
> but I wasn't sure what to make of that; send mail about what?
>
> perhaps it's related to...
>
> "RobS noted that the use case discusses using stepwise query refinement
> to navigate a concept hierarchy, and that perhaps
> concept-hierarchy-browsing is a better technique in that case."??
>
> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2
>
> The bug with the tail end of the IRC notes is fixed, along with
> various other nits. Current version is now...
>
> $Revision: 1.32 $ of $Date: 2004/07/19 14:20:39 $
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 20:30:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT