W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:23:35 -0700
To: "Steve Harris" <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOCEJHENAA.howardk@fatdog.com>

C'est bien. It constantly amazes me how many things I don't understand.

Howard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Steve Harris
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:31 AM
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:19:31AM -0700, Howard Katz wrote:
> > 
> > Steve,
> > 
> > Just to clarify Rob's example a bit (you don't mind, do you, Rob?):
> > 
> > 1) Rob's using an XML document with one or more <Person> 
> elements in it. It
> > looks like this could be any sort of XML document, not necessarily an
> > RDF/XML serialization. (Is that correct, Rob?)
> > 
> > 1) His use of "doc(http://foo/people.xml)/Person" implies a 
> single document
> > with a single <Person> as the root element. Since that's not 
> very useful,
> > it's more likely he meant to say:
> > 
> >     doc( http://foo/people.xml" )//Person
> 
> OK, so it was working over a particular RDF/XML serialisation. I didn't
> understand that from the message.
> 
> - Steve
> 
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 17:33:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT