W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: thoughts and some refs about AFS-2 UC (simplicity, minimalism )

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:45:44 -0600
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1080078344.2474.1069.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 15:28, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:21:34PM -0800, Rob Shearer wrote:
> 
> > Yes, the time and resources we'd devote to protocol are of concern to
> > me.
> 
> Hmm, so, Rob, yr against any sort of protocol standardization work at
> all in the first phase (that is, before we have a DAWG-QL document)?

I don't think that's what Rob was saying.

I'm sorry I sent my rant on "let's get to CR in 6 months!" It seems
to have sparked discussion of the whole charter and scope of the WG
and life the universe and everything. Discussion of the charter
itself is supposed to be done. We will inevitably need to do a little
bit of charter discussion to get a shared understanding of it,
but I'd prefer that any discussion of charter changes and such
started off-list. Talk to me and EricP, or talk to one or two
other WG members to see if there's support for a change before
you bring it to the whole list.

Let's please get back to telling each other stories, use cases,
and the like. I think that's the most constructive way to find
out what Rob and Kendall and the rest of us can agree on.

[...]

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 16:45:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:18 GMT