On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 08:30, Janne Saarela wrote: > Very good starting point. Formally may I suggest > we could use logic programming notation such > > (X, FN:name, "John Smith") Umm... why? Is that a notation we expect our audience to use when making their feature requests? > The evaluation result would then be either bindings > for X or if closure is a requirement, we would return > all triples with X bound to a different value. > > I would like to see closure implemented with the query > language in order to enable refined queries over > the result graph. Can you motivate this feature with a use case? i.e. a plausible story from real life? > > Let me post another email about inference. > > Janne -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 10:01:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:41:55 GMT