W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > June 2012

Re: SPARQL, PATCH and IE's XMLHttpRequest Object

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:09:35 -0700
Message-Id: <533AEA93-9B50-4F36-8673-E55EFE397A80@3roundstones.com>
Cc: "public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Hi Chime,

Thanks. I acknowledge that my comments were addressed. 

Bloody MS ;)

Regards,
Dave


On Jun 5, 2012, at 6:26, Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a duplicate response (the first one was mistakenly sent to
> David only and not the comment list).
> 
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011,  David Wood wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Microsoft Internet Explorer (currently deployed versions) do not support the sending of HTTP PATCH requests from their XMLHttpRequest objects [1].  This negatively impacts
>> implementors wishing to comply with the SPARQL WG's recommended use of PATCH defined at [2].
> 
> David,
> 
> My apologies for the late response (and the duplication).  Your
> comment got lost in the
> comment handling process, somehow.
> 
> In the currently published version of the Graph Store protocol, the
> HTTP PATCH mechanism is listed [1] as an Informative section of the
> specification (5.7 HTTP PATCH) and thus is not required of
> implementations of this specification.
> 
> We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comments have
> been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list (and this
> particular message).
> 
> Regards, Chime Ogbuji, on behalf of the SPARQL WG.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20120501/#http-patch
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 16:10:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 June 2012 16:10:08 GMT