Re: small erratum for SPARQL UPDATE 1.1

It does address my comment. The original wording looked like the text 
for MOVE was talking about COPY, but it will be clearer with your change.

thanks,

Bob

On 6/5/2012 2:43 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
>> Under http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#move<http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#move>
>> it says "As for COPY, if the destination graph does not exist, it will be created. " I
>> assume that it should say "As for MOVE..."
> In fact, this was meant as "Analogous to COPY". Anyways, as it seems to be potentially confusing and also redundant, I removed the phrase "As for COPY" now in the current Editor's draft cf. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#move
>
>
> I'd appreciate if you could briefly confirm that this addresses your comment,
>
> best regards,
> Axel
>
>
> --
> Dr. Axel Polleres
> Siemens AG Österreich
> Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research&  Technologies
> CT T CEE
>
> Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983
> Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859
> Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>          From: Bob DuCharme [mailto:bob@snee.com]
>          Sent: Saturday, 2 June 2012 6:05 PM
>          To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
>          Subject: small erratum for SPARQL UPDATE 1.1
>
>
>          Under http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#move it says "As for COPY, if the destination graph does not exist, it will be created. " I assume that it should say "As for MOVE..."
>
>          Bob
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 20:02:32 UTC