W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > June 2012

RE: Bindings in the DESCRIBE clause

From: Peter Waher <Peter.Waher@clayster.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:50:42 +0000
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1693EFE1FD641C42A0D542FCBC732DE696264640@EX3.YODA.UTOPIA.LOCAL>
Hello Andy

Thanks for the quick response.

I'll take your word for it. Looking at the document you linked to, I cannot see that the grammar has been updated to include variable bindings in the DESCRIBE clause [11], as is allowed in [9] for SELECT:

Peter Waher

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com] 
Sent: den 3 juni 2012 17:32
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Subject: Re: Bindings in the DESCRIBE clause

Hi Peter,

This has been fixed


By the way: BINDINGS is set to change to generalise it -- some discussion:



On 03/06/12 13:00, Peter Waher wrote:
> Hello
> Any reason why bindings in the DESCRIBE clause using expressions is 
> not permitted in SPARQL 1.1, when they are permitted in the SELECT clause?
> Compare [11] and [9] in:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#sparqlGrammar
> Example: Describe the first iri that is well defined, using the 
> COALESCE function.
> This could be done using BIND [62], but a SPARQL user would expect 
> syntax to be consistent.
> Sincerely,
> Peter Waher
Received on Sunday, 3 June 2012 16:51:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:12 UTC