W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Bindings in the DESCRIBE clause

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 16:31:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4FCB835D.4010308@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Hi Peter,

This has been fixed

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#sparqlGrammar


By the way: BINDINGS is set to change to generalise it -- some discussion:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-dev/2012AprJun/0018.html

	Andy

On 03/06/12 13:00, Peter Waher wrote:
> Hello
>
> Any reason why bindings in the DESCRIBE clause using expressions is not
> permitted in SPARQL 1.1, when they are permitted in the SELECT clause?
>
> Compare [11] and [9] in:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#sparqlGrammar
>
> Example: Describe the first iri that is well defined, using the COALESCE
> function.
>
> This could be done using BIND [62], but a SPARQL user would expect
> syntax to be consistent.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Peter Waher
>
Received on Sunday, 3 June 2012 15:32:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 3 June 2012 15:32:13 GMT