- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:23:38 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Hi! The first thing I want to challenge is the use of the term Graph Store in the context of the "Dataset HTTP Protocol" (not in SPARQL in general): The protocol may very well be used, and I'm quite sure it is already implemented (especially since it is not a new protocol for with regards to PUT, GET and DELETE) to manage repositories of old style serialized RDF Documents. This is not a graph store in the SPARQL sense (i.e. a single service; containing at least one unnamed graph etc.). I guess you could say "HTTP server or graph store" throughout. Best, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Ph.d Research Fellow, Semantic Web kjetil@kjernsmo.net http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
Received on Monday, 21 March 2011 22:24:11 UTC