W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2011

Re: SPARQL Update: Example 5

From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:26:06 +0000
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <CC268597-5EC4-4D97-8C6A-F042CDD1651F@deri.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Fixed in CVS - thanks for the heads-up

Alex.

On 26 Dec 2011, at 13:32, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> From:
> 
> http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/13551/minor-errors-on-sparql-update-specification
> 
> [[
> Example 5: In my opinion, data before and after should be exactly the same, since the graph pattern in the WHERE clause
> ?person a foaf:Person . ?person foaf:givenName 'Bill' is never matched against the data, since there is no assumption on the entailment regime considered in the surrounding text. I feel that the result of the DELETE/INSERT operation described in the example is achieved with RDFS entailment, through which the typing foaf:Person triples will be derived.
> ]]
> 
> the fix is to remove the "?person a foaf:Person" from the WHERE clause.
> 
> (The other two errors noted in the published doc have been corrected in the editors working draft.)
> 
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2011 11:41:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 December 2011 11:41:18 GMT