W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > May 2007


From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:35:17 -0700
Message-Id: <E4FA6B53-33F4-4642-812A-17F9182F022F@reading.ac.uk>
Cc: Geoff Chappell <gchappell@intellidimension.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com

>> Would you expect that the description would draw from any graph  
>> that had
>> contributed to the result (including the default graph)?
> Yes - the description can draw on any graph, or indeed on  
> information not available to the query pattern at all (that might  
> not be very useful, of course, but maybe adding a timestamp or a  
> signature).

Although the section is informative, you just slightly contradicted  

"and assembles a single RDF graph by taking a "description" from the  
target RDF Dataset"

This implies that all of the data about the selected resources are  
returned from the dataset... i.e., FROM and FROM NAMED.
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:35:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:08 UTC