W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > May 2007


From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:32:23 +0100
Message-ID: <4652C6B7.4020003@hp.com>
To: Geoff Chappell <gchappell@intellidimension.com>
CC: 'Richard Newman' <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

Geoff Chappell wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Newman [mailto:r.newman@reading.ac.uk]
>> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 10:08 PM
>> To: Geoff Chappell
>> Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: DESCRIBE with GRAPH
>>> I realized that DESCRIBE is somewhat loosely defined, but wondering
>>> what
>>> other implementations have done in this situation. Any guidance
>>> appreciated....
>> As an implementer: I would expect the DESCRIBE to run against the
>> dataset specified by the FROM/FROM NAMED, not just the contributing
>> graphs, and certainly not the whole store. As to what the
>> implementation should do with the named/default dichotomy... well,
>> that'll be implementation-defined.
> Thanks for the feedback. 
> Here's my use case:
> 	http://www.semanticwebsearch.com/query/sparql.rsp
> In this case, I'd expect no federation, but would want descriptions to be
> graph-bound. OTOH, I can also see cases where I'd want it to behave as you
> suggest. 
> DESCRIBE has no way to distinguish these cases since it uses up all of the
> available language features to specify what subjects to describe, but has no
> way to then say how to generate the descriptions (or where to pull them
> from). So perhaps we'll just have context specific behavior until it gets
> some more definition? (BTW, even with its shortcomings, I think we're better
> off with it, then without it).


One at the moment is to use the protocol request and add extra parameters - 
that means the request has additional information for the query even though 
it's not in the SPARQL query string itself.  For example, some systems allow 
adding "output=" to get JSON in a compatible way with AJAX, or including in 
the request that an XSLT stylesheet be included as either a server-side 
process or a stylesheet inclusion.


> -Geoff

Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 10:33:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:08 UTC