W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples

From: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:43:24 +0000
Message-ID: <43CE540C.7030706@ldodds.com>
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
CC: dawg comments <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Kendall Clark wrote:

> The WG discussed this issue and declined to specify any format for  
> describing error messages. As far as clients being unable to  "reliably 
> extract an error message", I can only reiterate that in the  HTTP case, 
> for example, the WSDL fault is serialized by an HTTP  status code (400 
> for MalformedQuery and 500 for QueryRequestRefused)  and the (optional) 
> fault-details part of the WSDL fault may be  included in the body of the 
> HTTP request, which I believe to be  reliably extractable.
> 
> Please let us know whether this sufficiently addresses yr comments?

Yes, thats fine.

I still think that standardising error messages/codes would be a good 
thing to do, but accept that it's not essential for the first spec, and
*could* given sufficient implementation experience, be achieved at a
later date.

Cheers,

L.

-- 
Home: http://www.ldodds.com      | "Simplicity is the ultimate
Blog: http://www.ldodds.com/blog | sophistication" -- Leonardo da Vinci
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 14:43:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT