W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > February 2006

Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:37:19 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20060222.163719.131448350.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Subject: Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:04:29 -0600

> On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 15:32 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> > I just started reading
> > 
> > 	http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220/
> > 
> > and was brought up short by the poor wording at its very beginning:
> > 
> > 	An RDF graph is a set of triples; each triple consists of a subject, a
> > 	predicate and an object. This is defined in RDF Concepts and Abstract
> > 	Syntax [CONCEPTS]. These triples can come from a variety of sources.
> 
> 
> Perhaps I have just read it too many times, but I can't see anything
> wrong with that wording.

The referent of the "This" could be one of any number of things.  It could the 
"RDF graph", "triple", "set of triples", "subject", "predicate', or "object".
There are even other possibilities for the referent of "This".

> > Surely better wording can be generated, particularly at this important part of
> > the document.
> 
> Do you have any improvements to suggest?

Yes, certainly.  However, the improvement depends on the meaning of the excerpt,
which I cannot discern.

> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

peter
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 21:37:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT