- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:04:29 -0600
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 15:32 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I just started reading > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220/ > > and was brought up short by the poor wording at its very beginning: > > An RDF graph is a set of triples; each triple consists of a subject, a > predicate and an object. This is defined in RDF Concepts and Abstract > Syntax [CONCEPTS]. These triples can come from a variety of sources. Perhaps I have just read it too many times, but I can't see anything wrong with that wording. > Surely better wording can be generated, particularly at this important part of > the document. Do you have any improvements to suggest? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 21:04:37 UTC