W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > April 2006

RE: Formal defintion of nested optionals

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:04:00 +0100
Message-ID: <DF5E364A470421429AE6DC96979A4F6F99A75A@sdcexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: Jorge Pérez <jperez@utalca.cl>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org> 

-------- Original Message --------
> From: Jorge Pérez <mailto:jperez@utalca.cl>
> Date: 18 April 2006 17:18

...

> Thanks again for your time, I will start with another thread to discuss
> about some *problems* (from my point of view) in the implementation of
> SPARQLer (ARQ) that reflects other ambiguities in the definitions of
> the last draft.  
> 
> 
> 
> - Jorge

This is the DAWG working group comments list. Please send ARQ bug reports to jena-dev@groups.yahoo.com 

http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARQ/support_request.html

	Andy
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 17:04:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT