W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > September 2005

Re: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10)

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 18:51:19 +0100
Message-ID: <43207A17.9030009@hp.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org



Ryan Levering wrote:
>  >> My apologies on my lack of clarity.  The query is fine in both cases,
>  >> but in the data listing, the header on the default graphs is "# Default
>  >> graph", which isn't nearly as clear as, for instance 9.3: "# Named
>  >> graph: http://example.org/dft.ttl" which is what the query actually 
> uses
>  >> for it's default dataset.  The point of FROM is that you're using a
>  >> named graph to specify a default/background graph, so it would be
>  >> clearer to actually have a name on that graph listing.
>  >>
>  >> Ryan Levering
>  >>
> 
>  > OK - I see now.
> 
>  > Would an editorial change like:
> 
>  > ----
>  > # Default graph (stored at http://example.org/foaf/aliceFoaf)
>  > @prefix  foaf:  <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
> 
>  > _:a  foaf:name     "Alice" .
>  > _:a  foaf:mbox     <mailto:alice@work.example> .
>  > ----
>  > adding something to the comment in the data and retaining the point 
> it is the
>  > default graph and not using the term "naming" make it clear?
> 
>  >       Andy
> 
> 
> Yep, that would work fine; as long as there's some mention of the URI of 
> that data, so the query makes more sense.

Ok - I'll make the changes then.  There wil be a formal response to your email 
when all the comments have been acted on.

> 
> Ryan
> 

	Thanks
	Andy
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 17:52:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT