W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > September 2005

RE: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10)

From: Ryan Levering <RRLevering@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:15:19 -0400
To: <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <97C9F8341808C244BFF39DCB6EDD5AD71116F3@server.home.ryan.levering.name>
>> My apologies on my lack of clarity.  The query is fine in both cases,
>> but in the data listing, the header on the default graphs is "# Default
>> graph", which isn't nearly as clear as, for instance 9.3: "# Named
>> graph: http://example.org/dft.ttl" which is what the query actually uses
>> for it's default dataset.  The point of FROM is that you're using a
>> named graph to specify a default/background graph, so it would be
>> clearer to actually have a name on that graph listing.
>>
>> Ryan Levering
>>

> OK - I see now.

> Would an editorial change like:

> ----
> # Default graph (stored at http://example.org/foaf/aliceFoaf)
> @prefix  foaf:  <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .

> _:a  foaf:name     "Alice" .
> _:a  foaf:mbox     <mailto:alice@work.example> .
> ----
> adding something to the comment in the data and retaining the point it is
the
> default graph and not using the term "naming" make it clear?

>	Andy


Yep, that would work fine; as long as there's some mention of the URI of
that data, so the query makes more sense.

Ryan
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 16:20:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT