W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2005

Re: SPARQL: IRIs vs RDF URI References [OK?]

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:44:20 +0100
Message-ID: <4353D4E4.20909@hp.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>The working group has decided to remove mention of "RDF URI Reference". 
>>SPARQl is defined in terms of IRIs.
> Looking at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ this sounds good.
> There is however a strange reference "[3987, sec 3.1]" which should
> probably be "[RFC3987, section 3.1]" or similar and a link to the entry
> in the references appendix.
> Thanks,

This is editorial so I have gone ahead and made that suggested change to the 
editors' working draft, includling a link to the RFC 3987 reference.

Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 16:50:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:06 UTC