W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2005

Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:17:38 -0400
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, kendall@monkeyfist.com, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20051017201738.GF5438@monkeyfist.com>

On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 02:53:53PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 15:12 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote:
> > Hi Kendal,
> > 
> > I'm starting the review of SPARQL do you prefer one mail with all  
> > comments?
> > Or an individual mail by comment?
> 
> I expect the best will be one message for each of your top
> 3 or 4 comments, and then a batch for the rest.
> 
> To the extent that you have independent comments that are
> requests to change the protocol (and not just the description
> of the protocol), please send those in separate messages.
> 
> It's probably easiest to batch up editorial suggestions,
> i.e. change requests that you're happy for the editor
> to do with as he pleases.

Karl,

I'm happy with Dan's suggestions. Sorry I didn't respond sooner, but I was
on vacation.

Cheers,
Kendall Clark
Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 20:19:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT