Re: WSDL comments on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft

On Oct 25, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Marsh wrote:

>
> During our review of the SPARQL LC draft, the WSDL WG identified three
> editorial items worthy of comment:

(Yr original comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf- 
dawg-comments/2005Oct/0051)

I believe the latest editor's draft, 1.81, (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ 
DataAccess/proto-wd), addresses these three concerns by:

- adding a table of prefix-URI mappings
- removing the inconsistent language from the status section
- adding a listing of the documents comprising the protocol

Does that address yr comments? Thanks for yr help with this spec.

Cheers,
Kendall