W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2005

Re: SPARQL Protocol: suboptimal examples

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:23:52 -0600
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1134588232.21371.59.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 20:00 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> Dear RDF Data Access Working Group,
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ has a
> number of problems in the various examples that encourage inccorect
> or suboptimal behavior; the draft should either be changed such that
> the issues do not occur or such that it is clear why that is not
> possible; in particular:
> 
>   * some violate http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#no-text-xml

Which ones? How so? What would you suggest instead?

>   * some violate http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#no-charset

Which ones? How so?

>   * some of the media types used in the document are not re-
>     gistered, e.g. text/rdf+n3 and application/dime.
> 
>   * the HTML document in 2.2.1.10 does not declare a character
>     encoding and is not a conforming HTML document
>
>   * the text/plain document in 2.2.1.9 does not declare a
>     character encoding
> 
>   * in 2.2.1.5 it seems the type should be application/rdf+xml
> 
> I also think using "my.example" in the Host: headers is suboptimal
> e.g. due to <http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#Translations>. I
> think a simple "example.org" or similar would be better here.
> 
> regards,
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 19:25:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT