W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2005

SPARQL Protocol: suboptimal examples

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:00:48 +0100
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <51p0q1lei5jcgoces9osiar2941j62hok0@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

Dear RDF Data Access Working Group,

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ has a
number of problems in the various examples that encourage inccorect
or suboptimal behavior; the draft should either be changed such that
the issues do not occur or such that it is clear why that is not
possible; in particular:

  * some violate http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#no-text-xml

  * some violate http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#no-charset

  * some of the media types used in the document are not re-
    gistered, e.g. text/rdf+n3 and application/dime.

  * the HTML document in 2.2.1.10 does not declare a character
    encoding and is not a conforming HTML document

  * the text/plain document in 2.2.1.9 does not declare a
    character encoding

  * in 2.2.1.5 it seems the type should be application/rdf+xml

I also think using "my.example" in the Host: headers is suboptimal
e.g. due to <http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#Translations>. I
think a simple "example.org" or similar would be better here.

regards,
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 19:00:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT