W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2005

[CLOSED] Re: WD 23 nov 2005, mini typos / mbox uris [OK?]

From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:12:01 +0100
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, RDF DAWG comments list <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <PM-EH.20051213171201.A51E2.1.1D@192.168.27.2>


>If these editorial changes address your comments, please reply with [CLOSED] 
>in the subject line.
they do, thanks

benjamin



On 12.12.2005 18:39:57, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>
>
>Benjamin Nowack wrote:
>> 
>> hi, just a minor thing:
>> 
>> the "mailto:" is missing in the foaf:mbox examples in section
>> 2.8.3 ("Blank Nodes") (at the end).
>
>Fixed (editors' working draft v 1.576) - added mailto: to URIs
>
>> 
>> the query result in 11.2.3.5 should also contain a "mailto:"
>
>Fixed: it's now section "11.4.5 str" of the editors' draft
>
>> 
>> there are several examples using a <mailto:name@TLD> or 
>> <mailto:name@2ndLD.unregisteredTLD> pattern, but those may
>> just have been chosen to better illustrate the example in 
>> question (, and I don't even know if that's incorrect at 
>> all within the mailto scheme).
>
>".example" is special - RFC 2606 ("2. TLDs for Testing, & Documentation 
>Examples") specfically sets aside ".example" as a TLD for examples.
>
>
>If these editorial changes address your comments, please reply with [CLOSED] 
>in the subject line.
>
>	Andy
>
>
>> 
>> regards,
>> benjamin
>> 
>> --
>> Benjamin Nowack
>> 
>> Kruppstr. 100
>> 45145 Essen, Germany
>> http://www.bnode.org/
>> 
>> 
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 16:12:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT