W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2005

Re: WD 23 nov 2005, mini typos / mbox uris [OK?]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:31:13 -0600
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
Cc: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>, RDF DAWG comments list <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1134415873.2319.336.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 18:39 +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
> Benjamin Nowack wrote:
> > 
> > hi, just a minor thing:
> > 
> > the "mailto:" is missing in the foaf:mbox examples in section
> > 2.8.3 ("Blank Nodes") (at the end).
> 
> Fixed (editors' working draft v 1.576) - added mailto: to URIs
> 
> > 
> > the query result in 11.2.3.5 should also contain a "mailto:"
> 
> Fixed: it's now section "11.4.5 str" of the editors' draft
> 
> > 
> > there are several examples using a <mailto:name@TLD> or 
> > <mailto:name@2ndLD.unregisteredTLD> pattern, but those may
> > just have been chosen to better illustrate the example in 
> > question (, and I don't even know if that's incorrect at 
> > all within the mailto scheme).
> 
> ".example" is special - RFC 2606 ("2. TLDs for Testing, & Documentation 
> Examples") specfically sets aside ".example" as a TLD for examples.
> 
> 
> If these editorial changes address your comments, please reply with [CLOSED] 
> in the subject line.

That is... please let us know whether you're satisfied with our
response.

If you're in a particularly helpful mood, you can put [closed] in the
subject line to save us a little bit of bookkeeping.

> 	Andy
> 
> 
> > 
> > regards,
> > benjamin
> > 
> > --
> > Benjamin Nowack
> > 
> > Kruppstr. 100
> > 45145 Essen, Germany
> > http://www.bnode.org/
> > 
> > 
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 19:31:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT