W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > June 2004

On Requirement 3.8 (Bookmarkable Queries)

From: <massimo@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:14:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3637.128.30.5.194.1088025252.squirrel@128.30.5.194>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Cc: massimo@w3.org

On Requirement 3.8 (Bookmarkable Queries), cf.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20040602/#r3.8 ,
a question of clarification:
Does "express as a URI" means a new class of URIs will
be created? Or does it rather mean "embeddable in a URI"

Obviously the first interpretation (esp. as a MUST) is
rather demanding. In the case of the first interpretation,
given the costs of creating a new URI scheme, what is
the rationale/benefit of going with the new URI scheme
rather than with the classic container approach?

Thanks,
-M
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 17:14:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:47 GMT